DOI: 10.1002/1545-5017.70098">
 

Parent-to-child information disclosure in pediatric oncology

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2026

Department/School

Psychology

Publication Title

Pediatric Blood & Cancer

Abstract

Background Despite professional consensus regarding the importance of open communication with pediatric cancer patients about their disease, actual practice patterns of disclosure are understudied. Extant literature suggests a significant proportion of children are not told about their diagnosis/prognosis, which is purported to negatively impact child/family psychosocial adjustment. The present study sought to characterize parent-to-child disclosure practices across child development. Procedure Primary caregivers (n = 301) of pediatric cancer patients aged 3-17 were recruited online or during outpatient infusion appointments to complete an anonymous, online survey about disclosure practices and parent/child/family functioning. Results More extensive disclosures were associated with older child age (p < 0.001), more frequent child questions, and greater parental desire for child involvement in medical decision-making (p < 0.001). Immediately salient information like diagnosis, upcoming treatment, and acute side effects was disclosed sooner after diagnosis (median = 1 week) than distal eventualities like prognosis and long-term side effects (median = 2 weeks). Most caregivers believed their child had a right to know about their illness, and would and did better cope emotionally and adhere to treatment. Barriers to disclosure for a minority of caregivers included fears that their child was too young and the caregivers' own lack of preparedness to deal with the prognosis themselves or make the disclosures. Caregiver and child distress were strongly associated (p < 0.001). Conclusions Results point to the complexity of illness-related information disclosure and nuances with which recommendations must be approached. The broader family context in which disclosure occurs, as well as when and how information is disclosed, may influence child distress more than the content of disclosures itself.

Comments

F. Hoodin and M. Byrd are faculty members in EMU's Department of Psychology.

*L. LaLonde is a doctoral student in EMU's Department of Psychology.

Please see the journal article for a complete list of authors and their affiliations.

Link to Published Version

DOI: 10.1002/1545-5017.70098

Link to Full Text

EMU Library Accessibility Request

Share

COinS