Date Approved
2026
Degree Type
Open Access Senior Honors Thesis
Department or School
Political Science
First Advisor
Joshua B. Koss, Ph.D.
Second Advisor
Shu Wang, Ph.D.
Third Advisor
Barbara Patrick, Ph.D.
Abstract
The American system of government requires that voters be able to choose their politicians, not the other way around. For centuries, politicians of all stripes have utilized the redistricting process to draw electoral districts that benefit themselves and their political party. This practice has triggered calls for redistricting reform at the national and state levels, including in Michigan. This research provides a case study of the Michigan Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission (MICRC). It focuses on the commission’s activities as part of a national conversation about redistricting reform and the use of Independent Redistricting Commissions (IRCs), composed of ordinary citizens, compared to traditional legislative redistricting. This preliminary research highlights the commission’s performance in the area of partisan fairness, using a series of partisan fairness metrics recognized in the political science literature, which show significant reductions in partisan disparities compared to the congressional and state legislative maps approved by the Michigan Legislature (ML) in the 2010s.
Recommended Citation
Clark, Grant M., "Should citizens or politicians draw the lines: A Michigan case study" (2026). Senior Honors Theses and Projects. 918.
https://commons.emich.edu/honors/918