Author

Alan Sangster

Date Approved

2025

Degree Type

Open Access Thesis

Degree Name

Master of Arts (MA)

Department or School

History and Philosophy

Committee Member

Ashley Johnson Bavery, Ph.D.

Committee Member

John G. McCurdy, Ph.D.

Committee Member

Steven J. Ramold, Ph.D.

Abstract

A comparison of the 1949 Smith Act trial of Communist Party leaders in New York and the 1952 Smith Act prosecution of six Detroit communists shows that Cold War anticommunism in the United States was not uniform; instead, it was shaped by local political contexts. While some New York communist leaders had ties to Soviet intelligence, they were ultimately prosecuted for their political speech which, under the Smith Act, rose to a crime. Conversely, the Detroit defendants had no clear ties to any Soviet intelligence officers and were simply prosecuted under the Smith Act for their political speech and local activities. Situated within a broader historiographical debate between revisionist and traditionalist historians, this comparative analysis demonstrates how anticommunist repression varied by region and by application. Through these contrasts, this piece challenges simplistic McCarthy-era narratives and contributes to Cold War scholarship by offering an abundance of nuance.

Included in

History Commons

Share

COinS